Development Of A Modified Bandage Backpack For Patients With Clavicle Fracture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31290/haj.v3i1.5941Keywords:
Modified bandage backpack, fixation, clavicle fractureAbstract
Clavicle fractures often occurred at the center due to lack of muscle and ligament protection. Management of clavicle fractures could be done operatively or non-operatively, with arm slings being the most common tool. However, arm slings tended to be less stable, so bandage backpacks were developed as an alternative. Although more stable in fixation, bandage backpacks still had weaknesses that required the development of new designs that were more comfortable and safe. This study aimed to develop a modified bandage backpack product for patients with clavicle fractures. This research used the Research and Development (R&D) method. The research procedure used the ADDIE model consisting of 5 stages including analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. Product validation was carried out by four media experts consisting of 2 nursing lecturers and 2 emergency room nurses who were members of BAPENA PPNI Blitar City. Results from expert validators showed a feasibility score of 92%. The results of this modified bandage backpack product assessment met the criteria as very feasible with some suggestions and input. The modified bandage backpack product was expected to be used as an alternative treatment for patients with clavicle fractures
References
Kihlström C, Möller M, Lönn K, Wolf O. Clavicle fractures: epidemiology, classification and treatment of 2 422 fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register; an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):82.
Soeselo R, Tegal K. Asuhan Keperawatan pada An . E dengan Gangguan Sistem Muskuloskeletal : Post Operasi Open Reduction Internal Fixation Fraktur Klavikula Dextra di Ruang Mawar. 2024;2(4).
Mittermayr R, Haffner N, Eder S, Flatscher J, Schaden W, Slezak P, et al. Safe and effective treatment of compromised clavicle fracture of the medial and lateral third using focused shockwaves. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):1988.
Peters J, Singh G, Hakobyan H. Surgical treatment of clavicular fractures, refractures, delayed and non-unions using a resorbable, gentamicin-eluting calcium sulphate/hydroxyapatite biocomposite. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022;551–60.
Sari NNSP, Asmara AAGY, Hamid ARH. Gambaran Karakteristik Fraktur Klavikula Di Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Sanglah Denpasar Tahun 2013-2017. J Med Udayana. 2020;9(1):7–11.
Lenza M, Taniguchi LFP, Ferretti M. Figure-of-eight bandage versus arm sling for treating middle-third clavicle fractures in adults: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):229.
Ayu S, Ningrum S, Anam AK, Abiddin AH, Malang PK. Pengembangan Selimut Emergency Stretcher Blanket Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Hipotermia Pada Korban Trauma. J Kesehat Mesencephalon. 2018;100–6.
Cole PA, Graves SC, Schroder LK. Management of associated injuries (clavicle and scapula). In: Injuries to the Chest Wall: Diagnosis and Management. Springer; 2015. p. 163–90.
Modi N, Mishra S, Mhatre J, Kambli M, Dave H, Gandbhir V. Broad Arm Sling vs Figure of 8 Bandage: The Better Choice in Conservative Management of Middle Third Clavicle Fractures in Indian Population. Indian J Orthop. 2022 Aug;56(8):1394–402.
Inam M, Baig MS. Outcome of management with poly-sling versus figure-of-eight brace in patients with mid-clavicular fracture. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2025;9(4):464–9.
Kask G, Raittio L, Mattila VM, Launonen AP. Cost-effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment for clavicle fracture: a systematic literature review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(4):391–9.
Scott ML, Baldwin KD, Mistovich RJ. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of pediatric and adolescent clavicular fractures: a systematic review and critical analysis. JBJS Rev. 2019;7(3):e5.
Chiang K, Wang H. Nurses’ experiences of using a smart mobile device application to assist home care for patients with chronic disease: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(13–14):2008–17.
Raja S, Carr D, Cohen M, Finnerup N, Flor H, Gibson S. The Revised IASP definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain [revista en Internet] 2021 [acceso 4 de marzo de 2022]; 161(9): 1-16. Pain. 2021;161(9):1976–82.
Sepucha KR, Atlas SJ, Chang Y, Freiberg A, Malchau H, Mangla M, et al. Informed, patient-centered decisions associated with better health outcomes in orthopedics: prospective cohort study. Med Decis Mak. 2018;38(8):1018–26.
Syam NM, Gebril H, Mohamed H, Mohammed Abed Elazeem YF, Weheida SM. Effect of Educational Nursing Guideline About Immobilization Complications Control on Nurses’ Knowledge and Safety Practice. Egypt J Nurs Heal Sci. 2021;2(2):1–21.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger SD. Product design and development (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
Calabretta G, Kleinsmann M. Technology-driven evolution of design practices: envisioning the role of design in the digital era. J Mark Manag. 2017;33(3–4):292–304.
Sapkota B, Shrestha S, Sahukhala S, Poudel RR. Medical Devices for Orthopedics. In: Medical Devices for Pharmacy and Other Healthcare Professions. CRC Press; 2021. p. 329–74.
Ekanayake C, Gamage J, Mendis P, Weerasinghe P. Revolution in orthopedic immobilization materials: a comprehensive review. Heliyon. 2023;9(3).
Sari BK. Desain pembelajaran model addie dan implementasinya dengan teknik jigsaw. 2017;
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyu Putra Perdana, Agus Khoirul Anam, Andi Hayyun Abiddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
-fococlipping-standard.png)
